In a significant step toward providing justice and relief, Air India has distributed interim compensation of Rs. 25 lakh each to the legal heirs of 166 passengers who lost their lives in the tragic 2020 Kozhikode plane crash. The move, though long overdue, marks a moment of closure for many families, as the national carrier begins fulfilling its compensation obligations. This interim payout follows prolonged legal and bureaucratic processes and comes amid ongoing calls for full and fair compensation under international aviation norms. The development underscores both the emotional and legal complexity surrounding aviation disaster reparations in India.
---
A Long-Awaited Relief for Bereaved Families
More than four years after the Air India Express Flight IX-1344 crash in Kozhikode claimed 21 lives and injured over 150 passengers, the airline has finally disbursed interim compensation to the next of kin of 166 passengers. Each eligible family has received Rs. 25 lakh as part of the airline’s initial compensation plan.
The Boeing 737 aircraft, operating under the Vande Bharat Mission, overshot the runway at Calicut International Airport on August 7, 2020. The crash, caused during landing under challenging weather conditions, remains one of India’s most devastating aviation tragedies in recent memory.
---
Compensation Framework and Legal Backdrop
The compensation is being paid under the framework of the Montreal Convention, which governs liability and compensation standards in international air travel. According to the convention, airlines are obligated to offer prompt advance payments to victims’ families to meet immediate economic needs, regardless of final legal liability.
The Rs. 25 lakh interim payout, though a partial amount, reflects the airline's acknowledgment of its humanitarian duty. However, legal proceedings for final compensation are still ongoing. The ultimate compensation amount may vary depending on factors such as the deceased’s age, income, and familial responsibilities, subject to adjudication in civil courts or settlement agreements.
---
Continuing Demands for Full Compensation
While the interim relief is a step forward, several families and legal representatives argue that the disbursed amount falls short of what is owed under global aviation norms. Many victims’ kin continue to seek higher settlements based on the Montreal Convention’s upper limits, which can amount to over Rs. 1.5 crore per individual, depending on circumstances.
Legal experts point out that Indian courts have historically varied in their interpretation of international conventions, sometimes leading to protracted litigation and delayed justice for victims. The current payouts may serve as a temporary balm but are unlikely to be the final word on compensation.
---
Aviation Safety and Institutional Accountability
Beyond financial compensation, the tragedy sparked a national conversation about aviation safety, airport infrastructure, and the accountability of regulatory authorities. The Kozhikode airport’s tabletop runway design was flagged repeatedly in earlier safety audits. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had also issued advisories regarding operational risks at such runways.
Following the crash, the government ordered a review of all tabletop airports and reinforced safety protocols, including stricter landing procedures in adverse weather. Air India Express, as the operator, undertook internal audits and revised pilot training programs.
---
Emotional Closure, But Not Justice Yet
For many of the bereaved families, the compensation brings a measure of emotional closure, if not full justice. The trauma of losing loved ones in such a catastrophic event is compounded by years of legal delay and uncertainty. While the interim relief of Rs. 25 lakh acknowledges the airline’s responsibility, the pursuit of comprehensive justice—both legal and moral—continues.
As India’s aviation sector expands and more citizens take to the skies, this incident serves as a poignant reminder of the need for not just safety and regulation, but also empathy and swift redress in the aftermath of disaster.
Comments